Hi, the best solution I think is to ask authors to clarify license and ask them to include LICENSE file in source tarball. R. --- Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base OS Core Services Brno Red Hat, Inc. +420 532 294 275 ----- "Adam Tkac" <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm reviewing dnsperf package - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798. Licence of code > is > written only in source code itself: > > ... > * Copyright (C) 2004 - 2008 Nominum, Inc. > * > * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and > its > * documentation for any purpose with or without fee is hereby > granted, > * provided that the above copyright notice and this permission > notice > * appear in all copies. > ... > > What should be correct licence tag? The licence is BSD compatible so > can I recommend BSD licence tag? > > Regards, Adam > > -- > Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
