Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:22:42 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Kofler wrote:

> it was overreaching bureaucracy which killed Fedora 
> Legacy (e.g. excessive QA requirements, paranoia such as not trusting 
> Bugzilla's authentication mechanisms, instead requiring GPG signing of Bugzilla 
> comments, which raised the barrier to entry), not lack of interested 
> developers.

Well, if there had been many "interested developers", they could have
simply appeared as boycotters of GPG clear-text signing in bugzilla
while at the same time offering update candidate rpms and reviews.
Hasn't happened IMO.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux