On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:30:34PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > If all that is "maintained" is a skeleton system, that won't do much good > (how often was a /@core/ or /@base/ packages that can't be upgraded the > cause of not moving to the next Fedora?) This is not the goal. Hopefully there will be much more maintained packages (and given that some people seem to be interested and they maintain or co-maintain a large number of packages) but this is to define a minimal set of packages that are mandatorily actively maintained. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
