Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 04:29:07PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:46:40AM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > > The work in the scope of this project will be less hard than what was > > > done in the scope of legacy, > > I just can't imagine why it would be less; if anything, much more (there > > are more packages today, and the "basic stuff that must work" is getting > > more and more). > Maybe on the packaging side, that is more packages to maintain (the > minimal target being @code + @base in my opinion, but this can be > discussed), but less on the QA and process side. Moreover now that core > is opened it means that contributors may be more involved in core > packages and may have done merge reviews (at least it is my case) > while for legacy people started with packages they had no > reason to know. If all that is "maintained" is a skeleton system, that won't do much good (how often was a /@core/ or /@base/ packages that can't be upgraded the cause of not moving to the next Fedora?) -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
