On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:46:40AM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > Show me the developers who are _commited_ on making it happen, then we can > talk. The infrastructure is in place. I am, and a few others. But the infrastructure is still not in place. I mean it may be physically, but there hasn't been an agreement from fedora leadership. But I'll propose something for th enext FESCo, we'll see how it turns out. > Fedora Legacy foundered because everybody said they wanted it, almost > nobody was willing to do the (hard!) work, and in the end the "many users" > didn't materialize either. The work in the scope of this project will be less hard than what was done in the scope of legacy, since there will be less QA, in fact the same amount than in fedora. I wanted to help fedora legacy, and I wasn't deterred by the packaging work, but by the amount of QA compared with fedora extras, the processes were much more complicated for me. I think that the quality was higher, too. I don't think that we need that quality right now. Legacy continued the Red Hat releases that were quite stable. Here the aim is to continue fedora release that are very unstable. The aim is to try to be as stable as possible, but with the same processes than in fedora. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
