Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:03:53PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I do think that if there is a penalty involved for redistributing copies
of GPL'd code, binary or not, it conflicts with the 'no additional
restrictions' clause of the GPL. If they apply this restriction only to
the non-GPL components, that would be different, but I don't know if
that is the case.
To start at the beginning of your confusion - it isn't a penalty. I'm entitled
not to distribute anything to you. I'm entitled to exclude aol.com from my
download site.
So its an additional service with conditions.
Yes, conditions that are an additional restriction of what I can do with
a GPL-covered work.
That is quite different. Your
GPL rights are the same before or after.
No they aren't if I lose something I've paid for.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
