On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 17:42 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > >> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:48 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > >>>> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> I am glad they are around, but not more and not less. > >>>> It is around becase RHEL is popular, and open source. > >>> And non-free > >> It /is/ free... you pay for support only. > > Wrong. RHEL is opensource, but it is not free. You can't get RHEL > > binaries anywhere. > The complete source in the form of > SRPMs is available in the Red Hat public ftp server. Did I say something else? > The free > availability of binaries is never a requirement for any of the free and > open source licenses. This is what RedHat propaganda is telling you. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
