On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:19 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:25 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > This rationale contributes to me not to consider RHEL and CentOS, which > >> > is the rationale why I don't consider them to be replacements for a > >> > "Fedora LTS". > >> > >> So CentOS is non-free? > > CentOS is free as "free-beer", but CentOS is not free to take decisions > > on their own, because they depend on RHEL's sources. > Can I put any package into Fedora then? Yes, but you can't modify packages in CentOS, which would break RHEL-compatibility, nor will you be able to add any package to EPEL, if a release of CentOS doesn't meet this package's demands. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
