On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:25 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > This rationale contributes to me not to consider RHEL and CentOS, which > > is the rationale why I don't consider them to be replacements for a > > "Fedora LTS". > > So CentOS is non-free? CentOS is free as "free-beer", but CentOS is not free to take decisions on their own, because they depend on RHEL's sources. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
