On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 06:48 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 13.10.2008 20:56, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one > >> package review per week. Each week at the FESCo meeting all FESCo > >> members should be asked what they did (as FESCo member) over the past > >> week to improve Fedora; they further should be asked what they (as FESCo > >> member) plan for the coming week to improve Fedora. That includes, but > >> is not limited to reviews. > > This seems rather silly - > > Of course it is -- just like the original proposal from dwmw2 imho, > where FESCo members were just asked what reviews they did (and nothing > else). But many people liked that "one review per week" proposal, hence > I thought I better come up with something else that goes in the same > direction, but at least is not that bad. Yes. The 'justify your existence to the electorate' connotations really weren't intended. Maybe a one-line report to FESCo each week, stating the number of reviews completed in the past week and the number still outstanding, would be perfectly sufficient. It wasn't about _forcing_ people to comply; it was just to keep it fresh in our minds, and make sure we remember that we agreed to do it (if, indeed, we _do_ agree to do it. So far it's just a suggestion). -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
