On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 08:25 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why would we want to? Just let things going as long as there is at least one > > maintainer committing something. Even if not all security issues get fixed, > > it's better than if none gets fixed. > > > Ha! Keeping a branch open because one maintainer interested in > something. That's not a distribution. That's a personal respository. Nonsense - Such a strategy would not be any different from how Fedora works now. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
