Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 08:25 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Why would we want to? Just let things going as long as there is at least one
> > maintainer committing something. Even if not all security issues get fixed,
> > it's better than if none gets fixed.
> 
> 
> Ha!  Keeping a branch open because one maintainer interested in
> something.  That's not a distribution. That's a personal respository.
Nonsense - Such a strategy would not be any different from how Fedora
works now.

Ralf



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux