Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 15:12 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:

[...]

> > I don't think anyone would sign up as a user for such "support". LTS
> > is about a fairly specific promise that is very hard to commit to.

> How so? It would be a legacy effort, run by volunteers, no guarantees,
> no commitments.

So would that satisfy /you/ in very particular? You would come screaming
bloody murder when one fine summer day, out of the blue, the "LTS" you were
planning on using for a few months more until you are ready to migrate to
the Latest And Greatest announces it will stop out of boredom of its last
maintainers... or just /the/ package you depend on is left stranded for
lack of interest... or terrible security problems in some unmaintained
packages show up...
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux