Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 10:46 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
No, it is an artifact of wildly changing APIs. That was just an obvious example. The same applies to apache/perl/python and just about every other package versioning.

But upstream chanced those APIs, and isn't upstream always right?

Even if it is right in the long run, the point of a distribution is to to protect its users from mid-release breakage. If I wanted the upstream version as-is every day, I'd download it directly myself. I expect a distribution to not break compatibility with what it packaged and shipped yesterday.

--
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux