Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Then no one should be surprised at the migration to Ubuntu and other distributions that have a more orderly transition from version to version.

Which problem do you have with the transition from Fedora x to Fedora
x+1?

Massive breakage... Compatibility with the jpackage repo would be one example. Keeping a mod_perl program working with apache/perl version changes would be another. Database version changes. Basically any API change anywhere is likely to break local programming as well as 3rd party repo usability, and Fedora changes wildly between versions. But more to the point, no version of Fedora is suitable for production use. For example, long after a stable, reliable kernel was available in RHEL5 and Centos, FC6 shipped an update kernel that crashed on a variety of scsi controllers. The nature of the project is just such that sufficient QA is never going to happen.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux