On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:17:53PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: >On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> >The proposal is not to create a new distribution, but simply haev EOLed >> >branches acl removed and leave th epossibility to build and push th >> >eresults, with a limitation of the changes to grave bug fixes and >> >security issues. >> >> Except that conflicts with what you said above about "...use innovative >> technologies while not being forced to update each year.". > >I wasn't clear, I should have said 'use innovative technologies during >the time fedora is not eol', while not being forced to update each year >(that's for the 'LTS' part). Ah. And how is that different from CentOS? At the time CentOS 5 was release, it also contained the latest "innovative" technologies. So, what would be different about a Fedora LTS? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
