On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > >The proposal is not to create a new distribution, but simply haev EOLed > >branches acl removed and leave th epossibility to build and push th > >eresults, with a limitation of the changes to grave bug fixes and > >security issues. > > Except that conflicts with what you said above about "...use innovative > technologies while not being forced to update each year.". I wasn't clear, I should have said 'use innovative technologies during the time fedora is not eol', while not being forced to update each year (that's for the 'LTS' part). -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
