On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:58:43PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri October 10 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > support from the boards. Some months ago I proposed something for a > > fedora lts that was brought down, maybe for good reasons, but the tone > > of the discussions really showed very few support, and I'd even say some > > antagonism. > > Iirc you would get support in terms of infrastructure in case you have a clear > proposal and enough people doing the work. Also they should show, that they > are really interested in doing this for long enough, that it does not look > like a failed project. E.g. starting now a Fedora LTS project and ending it > next year, because there are not enough maintainers/people interested in > doing the work, does not look good for Fedora. My proposal was clear: start the project when somebody has volunteered for each of the packages that are in @code and @base (and maybe other comps groups, I don't remember exactly). And keep a page with the packages maintained such as not to give wrong expectations. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
