On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:08 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 16:53 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 12:38 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> >> Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > >> >> > Itamar - IspBrasil wrote: > >> [snip] > >> >> The fact that they switched to CentOS is *good* for Fedora. > >> > I can not disagree more - To me, it's yet another evidence of Fedora > >> > being on the loose. > >> > >> You're going to have to expound on that. I do not see Centos in any > >> way as in competition with Fedora. > > EPEL drains away resources from Fedora. > > > > If people were investing the time they (as I feel waste) on supporting > > EPEL into Fedora, Fedora would be better. > > > > Ok. Ralf.. if you hate Fedora Absolutely not. > and all its projects so much, why do you > fricking stay around. Every fricking thread its "Fedora has too much > bueracracy. Fedora has a broken build system. EPEL steals resources.. > " What are you doing? I am complaining about a _few_ people having run down a once fascinating project, with the very same people closing their eyes in front this, of what I consider to be an inconvenient truth. Wrt. EPEL, I have always had the same opinion on it, since the very beginning. > >> Sure. With more devs, servers, time, etc. > > ... less bureaucracy, less committees/less chiefs/more Indians, > > different people, different strategies. > Then DO SOMETHING. Sigh, I repeatedly have been trying to do something, but always the same "Fedora chiefs" had machine-gunned almost each and every proposal. You know, you have been one of these - Do I really have to be more direct? Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
