On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:14 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 02:12 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 20:01 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:41:32AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > >> Let's get the final two packages reviewed -- and that's another area > > > >> where we could do with some improvement, because failing to approve > > > >> packages really _is_ verging on the 'deletionism' you spoke of. But > > > >> that's a separate discussion. > > > > > > > >Agreed, we can discuss this later. BTW: The word "deletionsm" did not > > > >come from me, it was Josh who said that, but of course I agree with him. > > > > > > I didn't say that. Though I agree we need to be getting more packages > > > approved. > > > > I think this is something we all agree on. ;) > > I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one > package review per week. +1. Such a step is way over due. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
