On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 20:46 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Done, but only for the "free" repo for now; new comps can be found for > review in CVS for RPM Fusion: > http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/comps/comps-f10.xml.in?root=free&view=markup > > File is on the way to the repo and should be available at > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/<arch>/os/comps.xml > in a few minutes. > > James, Jesse, does that look like it should look like? I think so. The real test is what does yum/anaconda see with these repos. Ideally it'd just be one instance of each group, with all the right content of the combined repos. > > Some questions: > > - Should I better remove the fields "<_name>", "<_description>" > "<default>" and "<uservisible>" to avoid mixing up what comes from > Fedora's comps.xml? I'm honestly not sure what will happen. Worth testing I suppose. It may not work too well if people use the repo alone without a matching Fedora repo. Of course, that would be silly to do, but meh... > > - I don't define any category's; is that okay? I think that's fine, provided again that the user uses a Fedora repo with it to pick up that missing grouping information. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
