Re: No dynamic groups in PackageKit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: No dynamic groups in PackageKit
From: Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:16:54 +0200
In-reply-to: <1222150606.30758.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723)

I think this discussion is getting a little heated and it is not themost constructive, if you want something to change IMHO.


I agree in there is some issues with the static groups currently in pk.
so i have made this proposal on the upstream packagekit list.

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/2008-September/003675.html

To solve some of the issues being discussed in this thread.

Tim

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No dynamic groups in PackageKit : Solved
  - From: Richard Hughes
- Re: No dynamic groups in PackageKit
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis

References:
- How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Tim Lauridsen
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Richard Hughes
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Richard Hughes
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: James Antill

Prev by Date: Re: Instant Mirror Status...?
Next by Date: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
Previous by thread: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
Next by thread: Re: No dynamic groups in PackageKit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]