On 23.09.2008 19:37, James Antill wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 19:13 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Livna/RPM Fusion in the past tried to put its packages into the same
groups as Fedora did.
No, groups are defined by their groupid, Livna always created searate
groups (they had a different ID) ... they just named them the same.
The old and unmodified comps.xml for FC6 is still available
http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/6/i386/comps.xml
The <id>-fields back then were round about those Fedora still uses these
days -- take "<id>sound-and-video</id>" for example; but maybe something
else was from with those files...; I only changed those to be livna
specific for F7 and later a few months ago on request from Fedora
skvidal when the problem that was mentioned earlier showed up
> [...]
Newer yum's find all groups that match, so there's no problem on
current Fedora 9 or newer.
Good to know, thx.
> [...]
CU
knurd
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
