On Tue, 23.09.08 17:40, Olivier Galibert (galibert@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > I know. But ALSA hides that in a library, so you never have to deal > > with these ugly details. Ain't that great? > > Depends on the library. In ALSA's case, it's a particularly badly > designed one, annoyingly enough. As an API, OSS is better. I know both APIs very very well. Probably much better than most people. I have been using features of both APIs that apparently noone ever used before me. PA probably uses a larger part of the ALSA API than any other client. And from that experience I can say that while ALSA has issues it certainly gets much much more right than OSS ever did. But anyway. We have to agree to disagree. This discussion is pointless. Let's end this here. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
