On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 08:29 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > >> So the answer seems to be that glibc will not change it's simple > >> internal resolver (which has more limitations than just noticing > >> resolv.conf changes), but the recommendation is that lwresd or a local > >> caching nameserver be used for more complex DNS setups. > > > > A caching nameserver that can be instructed what to do when conditions > > change is what we really need. > > Isn't it a little late to redesign the internet so names and addressing > aren't delegated hierarchically? What would this mean ? But let me ask a question in your own style: do you understand the difference between a normal DNS server and a local cache ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
