On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 18.09.2008 14:13, Josh Boyer wrote: > > == Summary == > > === Features === > > [...] > > As an added note, the following Feature pages have not been updated. They > > need to be updated before Beta or they will be dropped as Features: > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterStartup > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EFI > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FirstAidKit > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GNOME2_24 > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoodHaskellSupport > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HDTVEnhancements > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KernelModesetting > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OnlineAccountsService > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.6 > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SaveToBugzilla > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sugar > > ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TimeZoneAndLocation > > What exactly are the consequences if a Feature "will be dropped"? It sounds a > bit like a threat and as something bad. But is it really? > I didn't really see it as a threat but a way for people to know they are accountable when they put a feature up there and it doesn't get done. I suspect this is aimed at people who assume their feature will get in and don't do the work or make the deadlines. -Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
