Re: consequences when a feature gets dropped (Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-17)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:25 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> As mentioned, KDE was just an example.
> 
> Or IOW: I'm wondering what new Features we might have no FeaturePage, 
> but are nevertheless worth mentioning in the release notes or should get 
> testing during QA.

Magic 8-ball says??

Seriously, this is a serve yourself kind of deal here.  If you want your
software tested and lauded, you need to bring it to people's attention.
The amount of churn in Fedora in a daily basis is huge, and trying to
extrapolate feature type information from the builds is no easy task.

If you wished to create some group of people who tried to do this, I
wouldn't stop you, in fact I'd welcome it.  There just isn't anybody
doing it right now.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux