Re: consequences when a feature gets dropped (Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-17)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis said the following on 09/18/2008 09:58 AM Pacific Time:
On 18.09.2008 14:13, Josh Boyer wrote:
== Summary ==
=== Features ===
 > [...]
As an added note, the following Feature pages have not been updated. They
need to be updated before Beta or they will be dropped as Features:
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterStartup
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EFI
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FirstAidKit
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GNOME2_24
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoodHaskellSupport
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HDTVEnhancements
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KernelModesetting
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OnlineAccountsService
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.6
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SaveToBugzilla
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sugar
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TimeZoneAndLocation

What exactly are the consequences if a Feature "will be dropped"? It sounds a bit like a threat and as something bad. But is it really?


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Dropping

Since the beginning of the feature process we have referred to it this
way.  To date this is best motivational technique we've been able to
find to get people to update their feature pages.  We'd gladly accept
suggestion for something better :)

"dropped" essentially means it won't be advertised as a key feature of
the release on this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/FeatureList

No where does it say the package has to be removed from the distro if
the proposed feature isn't completed in time.  We had some examples in
Fedora 9 where this was the case.

What for example will happen if the owners of the feature GNOME2_24 don't update the page. Will rawhide switch back to Gnome 2.22? Won't Gnome 2.24 be mentioned at all in the release notes? Will it not get any QA? Will we stick to Gnome 2.24 in F11? Will Spot send his nijas (¹)?

CU
knurd

(¹) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Ninjas



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux