Simo Sorce wrote:
>
So the answer seems to be that glibc will not change it's simple
internal resolver (which has more limitations than just noticing
resolv.conf changes), but the recommendation is that lwresd or a local
caching nameserver be used for more complex DNS setups.
A caching nameserver that can be instructed what to do when conditions
change is what we really need.
Isn't it a little late to redesign the internet so names and addressing
aren't delegated hierarchically?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
