Re: Non-X text mode console

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Snook wrote:
sean darcy wrote:
David A. Wheeler wrote:
I routinely use text mode console without X, for a
variety of reasons.  For example:
* I have a number of systems (servers) at runlevel 3
* console is critically important when X fails. "Log in with ssh"
  doesn't work when ssh or the network fails.

Have I missed something...big? If I can't ssh into those boxes, can't I have someone just use the console in person? Some of these boxes are ooold - 600mhz 256mb, which BTW, works superbly at runlevel 3. X would be a real strain, and is generally not even installed.

Tell me it ain't so.

sean


It ain't so. This is a gross misunderstanding of the fact that we're moving to using a kernel framebuffer by default, like some distros did almost a decade ago. And you can opt out with 'nomodeset' on the boot command line, to get the old vga BIOS framebuffer.

-- Chris

So if I have a box set to runlevel 3 without any kernel parameters, what's on the monitor? Nothing?

How do I tell a tech to get to grub.conf and change the kernel parameter? ( I can imagine this phone call!)

Or does the tech reboot ( hard, ctl-alt-del? ) and edit from the grub screen?

Or does the kernel framebuffer display on the monitor? If so, that's fine. I don't care about fonts or pretty colors. A simple command line is OK.

sean

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux