Le lundi 15 septembre 2008 à 18:16 +0200, Denis Leroy a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > And that's ok. Do remember that X was defined at a time hardware was > > vastly less powerful and core X is not wasteful at all. Compared to > > how the rest of the system has bloated, X is definitely lean and mean. > > I agree with that point. Does an X-based mingetty replacement actually > exists ? Something that's proven to be sufficiently fail-safe (will work > even with half-broken X configurations and such?). I suspect that as soon as much of the hardware pocking is moved from xorg to the kernel and X can be run as a normal user "X-based mingetty replacement" will be just running a x term fullscreen in an autoconfigured X instance. Of course one could theorically write a much lighter solution using only freetype (cairo, pango?) and an xkb-config parser -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
