On Monday, 15 September 2008 at 12:35, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le Sam 13 septembre 2008 00:59, Arthur Pemberton a écrit : > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Woehlke > >> <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> No, > >>> thanks; I'd rather have X fail to start and dump me at a normal > >>> console from > >>> which I can fix the problem *without rebooting*, much less needing > >>> to dig up > >>> a rescue disk :P. > >> > >> I believe we already do that today, and am not advocating removing > >> that functionality if possible. Anyways, I've said what I need to, > >> so > >> hopefully people won't be surprised later. > > > > > > I'm confused. Is Fedora really going to remove non X consoles? > > Mid-term that wouln't be such a bad idea. One would have to say why it is a good idea in the first place. > Of course the replacements need to prove their robustness. What replacements do you have in mind? Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
