Re: Another xulrunner breakage [Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-07-19]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>> > Also, why the hell is this stuff not tested in -devel first?
 +1000

   >> Because it was secutity related fix, so it has to hit stable  asap.
   >  
> Doesn't matter. It doesn't install at all if it breaks dependencies
> of *installed* packages. Not even --skip-broken helps in that case.
 +1000

 This never  shouldn't  happen, stable != rawhide

Oscar Bacho

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux