Le samedi 19 juillet 2008 à 14:05 +0200, Martin Sourada a écrit : > Next, there should be some policy in pushing such updates for stable > releases. I mean, what is the point in releasing security update for > xulrunner while it cannot be installed due to tons of broken deps? Also, why the hell is this stuff not tested in -devel first? We have a packageset which is rushed to stable with little testing. And we have a packageset which is left rotting in rawhide till the release deadlines toll. Do anyone really thinks there is not relation? When the update process is not streamlined in -devel, it's no surprise it bombs in -stable when security updates are due. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
