2008/7/19 Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 11:05 +0000, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Summary of broken packages (by owner): >> martin.sourada AT gmail.com >> gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.i386 >> gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.ppc >> gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.ppc64 >> gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.x86_64 > > Already pending for stable update [1]. However looking at the > problematic deps it seems most of them are caused by recent update of > xulrunner. Again! First of all we should review whether all these > packages need to depend on precise version of gecko-libs, yesterday I > checked that gxine does not and removed the versioned deps. > > Next, there should be some policy in pushing such updates for stable > releases. I mean, what is the point in releasing security update for > xulrunner while it cannot be installed due to tons of broken deps? We > have chain builds, they only work in devel. >we have support for multiple package updates, why has > xulrunner been rebuilt and pushed only with firefox, > epiphany(-extensions), yelp and devhelp [2], and without mentioning it > on the -devel(-announce) list? bodhi needs to do dep check before pushing updates. If the updates have broken deps the push should fail. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
