On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 11:05 +0000, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Summary of broken packages (by owner): > martin.sourada AT gmail.com > gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.i386 > gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.ppc > gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.ppc64 > gxine-0.5.11-17.fc9.x86_64 Already pending for stable update [1]. However looking at the problematic deps it seems most of them are caused by recent update of xulrunner. Again! First of all we should review whether all these packages need to depend on precise version of gecko-libs, yesterday I checked that gxine does not and removed the versioned deps. Next, there should be some policy in pushing such updates for stable releases. I mean, what is the point in releasing security update for xulrunner while it cannot be installed due to tons of broken deps? We have chain builds, we have support for multiple package updates, why has xulrunner been rebuilt and pushed only with firefox, epiphany(-extensions), yelp and devhelp [2], and without mentioning it on the -devel(-announce) list? Martin References: [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/gxine-0.5.11-18.fc9 [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6518
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
