On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:31:11 +0200, drago01 wrote: > >> > Le samedi 19 juillet 2008 à 14:05 +0200, Martin Sourada a écrit : >> > >> >> Next, there should be some policy in pushing such updates for stable >> >> releases. I mean, what is the point in releasing security update for >> >> xulrunner while it cannot be installed due to tons of broken deps? >> > >> > Also, why the hell is this stuff not tested in -devel first? >> >> Because it was secutity related fix, so it has to hit stable asap. > > Doesn't matter. It doesn't install at all if it breaks dependencies > of *installed* packages. Not even --skip-broken helps in that case. > As you can see in bodhi, it has hit several testers quickly. I just said why it was done, not that it was the right thing to do. As I already said, bodhi should block updates that break deps. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
