On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:12:09 -0400 Michel Salim <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > At the upcoming FUDCon I plan to hold a session or two regarding > > requirements and discussions about the future of our package source > > control. This is NOT a time to argue about one SCM being "better" than > > another. I don't really want to hear any SCM names at all, rather I'm > > interested purely in only what we require and what we'd like out of our > > package source control. I'm sending this mail to get people thinking > > about it, and to give the people who won't be at FUDCon a chance at > > dropping their thoughts in. > > > ... > > I'll be gathering feedback over the next few days and putting them into > > a not as of yet created wiki page. > > > Being able to keep classify patches: > - - backports from upstream SCM > - - fixes for upstream, already forwarded (with integration to upstream > bug-filing system if possible, or at least the bug report URL) > - - fixes for upstream, unsent (still being tested or cleaned-up) > - - Fedora-specific fixes, not to be forwarded You can do all of those already. Just include comments at the top of the patch itself. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
