-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > At the upcoming FUDCon I plan to hold a session or two regarding > requirements and discussions about the future of our package source > control. This is NOT a time to argue about one SCM being "better" than > another. I don't really want to hear any SCM names at all, rather I'm > interested purely in only what we require and what we'd like out of our > package source control. I'm sending this mail to get people thinking > about it, and to give the people who won't be at FUDCon a chance at > dropping their thoughts in. > ... > I'll be gathering feedback over the next few days and putting them into > a not as of yet created wiki page. > Being able to keep classify patches: - - backports from upstream SCM - - fixes for upstream, already forwarded (with integration to upstream bug-filing system if possible, or at least the bug report URL) - - fixes for upstream, unsent (still being tested or cleaned-up) - - Fedora-specific fixes, not to be forwarded Regards, - -- Michel Salim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhOYYQACgkQWt0J3fd+7ZBXVACeJNe4kLUXh4NTZ/S/Q2H4QHzQ qPgAn1A1zt4AZHjz11LsAmJAekm06jX9 =caCJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
