On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:36:27 +0200 Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:19:38PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Thank you all for your thoughtful consideration. > > - be able to easily rebase/refresh a patch That's pretty outside the scope of any SCM we deploy. Use tools like quilt. > - be able to keep track of details about patches (author, committer, > some special marks (e.g. "signed-of-by", "reviewed-by", ...) You can do this in the patches themselves. > - be able to generate statistics about patches (diffstat) Erm... just use diffstat? What does that have to do with the SCM? > - be able to generate change logs > > - be able to generate patches (to avoid unwanted "creativity", it'd > be nice to use same format for all Fedora patches) Generate patches from what? We don't store exploded tarballs. We store tarballs and patches. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
