On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 09:38 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > I own some packages that don't rebuild (in F-9), I was waiting for an > upstream release that didn't came (for libnc-dap, though there was a > release of libdap). I'd prefer if they were kept. I'll take the time to > patch them to rebuild, but I'd prefer doing it only if needed. This is why I want to use the non-responsive maintainer policy. If you've responded in the bug you wouldn't be triggered as non-responsive. We'd still have to figure out some way to get your build going, but we wouldn't be waiting on a black hole. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
