On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 15:51 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > (and of course there are packages with no dist tag which fail too) so > the number of packages we'd consider here isn't huge, but is nonzero. > > Please consider adopting a policy regarding packages which continue to > fail to build from source for a given distribution. These packages > need attention, if only because we have disabled F6 buildroots which > would be necessary to build and fix a bug in such a package package in > the F9 release. I agree with Will Woods' suggestion (pardon if I > mis-attribute) that such cutoff point should be the Beta cut of the > next version of the release. For me, Beta is too late. I'd rather see them go post-alpha, like immediately post-alpha. Since these all have ftbfs bugs filed, can't we use those bugs as the basis of finding non-responsive maintainers, and initiate the orphan process on these packages, which would get sweeped up in that same post-alpha, pre-beta timeframe? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
