On Thu May 29 2008, "G" wrote: > For bugs which does not have any Bug ID tagged and for an enhancement > for which there is no note written about the enhancement, should i > take this approach of just installing the package, check whether the > basic application works and it does not corrupt any other stuff and > inform it works ? or should i do something more than this and yeah There is no real policy about this, therefore I say checking the basics is enough for now. You can also note this in the comment. > documenting it somewhere should be fine , there should be some > databasse we need that helps as a reference. This is mandatory You can just start and try to create some reference for some packages you are interested and join the QA-Sig, i.e. contact the people listed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/QA Maybe you can together create a framework / procedures to document the test cases and assign them to testers. Also you can ask on the Fedora testing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
