On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:03 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Mer 21 mai 2008 19:32, Les Mikesell a écrit : > > > > > I don't have a problem with Xorg taking any amount of time they want. > > > The problem is in fedora shipping a pre-release - or perhaps even more > > > so in their claim of knowing that the ABI is finalized before it is in > > > fact published as a standard. > > > > I suggest you complain to the xorg 1.5 release engineer the Fedora > > xorg maintainer is not coordinating with him closely. And then that > > you follow the advice of the xorg 1.5 release engineer on this issue. > > You know I'm both, right? And a superhumanly good job you've done for this release twice over, for that matter. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
