Christopher Stone wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. The bottom line is that Fedora does not care about, cater to, or
promote binary drivers. Period.
Do they care about having a usable fully functional system for a
majority of their users?
You pulled that number out of your ass. And it's wrong. You have no
data to back that up, and what data does exist on smolts.org shows ATI
has a lead.
I *have* looked at the smolt stats, and they don't make any sense at
all. 1.6% and 1.9%, that doesn't make any sense, the smolt stats have
to be wrong. I'm sure the total number of nVidia and ATI fedora
desktop users is more than 4%.
Yes, that page is extremely strange if you are looking at the
classes/video. ATI and Nvidia are actually 83%+ of the identified
adapter vendors although shown as 1.9/1.6 respectively, but by devices
vmware and virtualbox virtual adapters come out on top.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
