um let me be clear, the comment about Ajax raising his kids was not meant as a personal attack. I'm sure he is a fine parent. On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Christopher Stone > <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I don't give a hoot if the packages are supported or not, I just want >> an easy way to get my nVidia card working. All you people do is gripe >> and moan about how much work it would be and all this and that. Look, >> its just a matter of adding rpms to a repo, make an "unsupported" repo >> if you have to. The bottom line is you want to have as many people >> testing the OS as possible. > > There's nothing stopping you or anyone else from creating an > unsupported repository containing packages which are not signed by the > fedora gpg key... if you have the resources to host it...then just do > it. In fact we've seen developers generate unsupported repositories in > the past...there was a repo for open wireless development kernels for > a time that were not supported that was very useful and yet very > unsupported by the Fedora project itself in any way whatsoever. > > This is going to be my last post in response to you. I think your > comments concerning ajax in this post have crossed a line which should > not have been crossed and I believe that continuing to have a dialog > with you about anything at all...is only going to reinforce the idea > that your choices in how your shown displease with the situation is > something condonable. > Let me be clear, I think your choices to personally attack ajax are > reprehensible and quite distasteful to read. There's absolutely no > reason to attack ajax personally as you have done. If you want to > continue to be upset over the technical issues..fine be upset...but > keep it impersonal. Hint, bringing up someones parenting skills...is > personal. Even as a joke, its really not proper to do in what is > clearly a heated exchange. It certainly doesn't help keep emotions > low. > > I would humbly suggest you take a moment and reread the full extent of > what your have written so far and reflect as to whether this is the > best way to persuade someone to do what you want, and how you'd > personally react to this sort of attempt to at a character > assassination if aimed in your direction. > > I would also encourage others who are reading this thread to refrain > from responding to you, until you've made a sincere retraction and an > apology. > > -jef"Knows from experience, that its just too easy to cross the line > in a heated exchange without intending to, and it's really important > to be able to take a step back. I could probably write a memior's > worth of prose just recounting when I crossed the line and had to > swallow some pride and make amends."spaleta > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
