Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 21:50:30 -0600, "Jerry James" <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> said:

JJ> Actually, we did update it on the 21.5 (beta) branch quite awhile ago.
JJ> It's true that the 21.4 (stable) branch has never been updated,
JJ> though.

In second thought, that really brings up one of my primary points:
People don't like upgrading autoconf version usage on old branches
because it brings about unknown effects a lot of the time.  IE, it's
simply not safe to do without heavy understanding and testing.  It's
like adding a feature; you don't do it on stable releases because it
can't be trusted.

And thus, if we want developers to use fedora we should distribute
multiple versions of the development tools when version updates have
potentially large ramifications.
-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux