Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Mon, 05 May 2008 10:59:08 -0400, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

BP> PROPOSAL: I'd like to keep just the following packages and would like to
BP> have release engineering to block the older packages from Rawhide:
BP> autoconf-2.61-10.fc9.noarch.rpm
BP> automake-1.10.1-2.noarch.rpm

I don't think this is helpful to developers.  Those packages aren't just
used by Fedora packaging developers.  They're used by anyone anywhere
who needs to maintain a build system.  Different software components
require older versions of autoconf to successfully work on.  Sad, but
very true.  I have multiple installations of autoconf in place and I use
them all.  Not because I want to, but because the base package I'm
working on doesn't work with newer versions (this is particularly true
from autoconf < 2.5 to anything > 2.5 and also true for 2.58 > 2.59 or
beyond).  Fixing a configure.in file to make it portable is often a ton
of work for a big package.  If it wasn't, XEmacs would have updated it's
configure.in file from 2.13 to something more recent a long long time
ago ;-)
-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux