Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Tue, 6 May 2008 18:56:49 +0300, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> said:

VS> Not really; only those who change things that require autoconf to be
VS> re-run.  The generated "configure" for 21.4 is not only in the dist
VS> tarballs, but also in hg.

Yep.  My only point was that developers need to be able to call older
autoconfs to work on a package.

(the number of times I've had to hack configure.in in order to get a
package to build on a modern system is more than the number of fingers I
own)
-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux