Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:46:45 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Tue, 06 May 2008 07:24:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> > Tom Lane wrote: >> > >> > >> > > Indeed, in my experience the entire POINT of a -libs subpackage is >> > > that >> > > it doesn't pull in the whole base package. If it does, why are you >> > > bothering to create a separate libs subpackage? So the review >> > > guidelines are indisputably broken here. >> > >> > -libs, even if Require'ing the base pkg, helps multilib-wise. >> >> If -libs requires base pkg, there's no need to split the two. >> >> And it cannot help multilib-wise, because the -devel => -libs => base pkg >> chain is still intact. > > Unless RPM doesn't care about the arch of the base pkg... and takes > either one, ... oh well... ah ha! ;) (yes, that is the case). -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
