Re: Multilib Middle-Ground

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell <at> gmail.com> writes:
And you'll just ignore the entire prior history of fedora?

You mean the prior history of _Java_!

If you mean the reason it - and much of the other currently open source software exists at all, you shouldn't ignore that either. As much as I like open source and freely available code, I recognize that much would never have existed if it were not for original proprietary work - and that we are all better off as a result of everyone's participation with the proprietary version.

Fedora merely shipped the only available option which was Free Software. Blame Sun Microsystems for not having made their implementation Free Software right from the start.

I blame fedora for not maintaining a relationship with japackage.org until their users no longer need what they provide. In fact, I don't see any reason any java code needs to be specialized for a distribution or included in its own repository. Why not just make fedora work with an external repo for java that works across distributions/versions and avoid the issue entirely instead of shipping something that isn't quite java? Even when a real java can be included, what is the point of having specialized distro/version packages of the apps that don't need specialization?

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux